0%

Trading Spaces recap: risk-off reset — is BTC headed for $50K, or just catching its breath?

1 시간 전 8 분 읽기
뉴스 기사 배너 이미지

TL;DR

In this episode of Trading Spaces:

  • The move that scared traders wasn’t just the drop — it was the speed. BTC cut through multiple support zones with almost no meaningful pause.

  • Den’s base case: a bounce/consolidation first, then a potential “drip lower” unless macro conditions improve materially.

  • Bottoms are usually a time game, not a price game. Major bottoms tend to come after weeks/months of boredom, not days of chaos.

  • Weekly RSI is oversold, but that’s not a buy signal by itself. In prior cycles, RSI dipping sub-30 happened months before the eventual bottom.

  • ETH looks structurally worse than BTC right now, with key supports sliced and a “range-y” structure that’s harder to trust.

  • HYPE is the notable outlier showing isolated strength, but it’s now pressing into heavy resistance — and Den wants a clean reclaim before getting bullish.

Macro backdrop: why this didn’t start in crypto

Matt framed this week’s selloff as an extension of a broader risk reset that spilled into crypto — not a purely crypto-native event.

Key ingredients:

  • AI/mega-cap volatility and “Are we out ahead of our skis?” jitters

  • Huge capex expectations (and the market questioning risk appetite)

  • Rotation out of risk hitting multiple assets in the same window

  • BTC positioned at the tail end of the risk curve — meaning it absorbed the shock when the market got defensive

Matt also pointed to the ETF tape as a pressure valve: IBIT printed its biggest volume day ever (by a wide margin), and the flow skew leaned heavily toward sell pressure.

Bitcoin: the break was clean — so treat bounces like bounces

Den’s first read was straightforward: this wasn’t a gentle breakdown. It was a support liquidation.

What stood out:

  • Three-day candle closes with minimal wicks

  • Support levels blown through with almost no reaction

  • Even major historical reference points (including the 2021 ATH zone) didn’t produce meaningful slowing

Den’s playbook from prior bears

Den compared the current structure to typical bear sequencing:

  1. Leg down

  2. Consolidation

  3. Break down again

  4. Repeat until the market transitions into a long, dead, low-volume floor

Her key point: we don’t have the “dead zone” yet. And without that time-based bleed, calling “the bottom” is usually premature.

So… are we going lower?

Den’s “gun-to-head” view:

  • Near-term: a bounce is plausible (especially after such a fast drop)

  • Medium-term: likely chop/consolidation

  • Then: another leg lower is on the table unless macro meaningfully improves

If you bought the low, Den’s advice was blunt: be conservative with targets. In counter-trend environments, the market can give you a sharp rebound — and then erase it just as fast.

Weekly RSI: oversold can stay oversold

Matt addressed a common reflex traders had this week: “Weekly RSI is below 30 — it’s oversold, so we bounce.”

Yes, weekly RSI dipped into oversold territory — but he emphasized the historical nuance:

  • In June 2022, weekly RSI moved into oversold well before the true cycle lows.

  • Same idea in 2018: oversold was a condition, not a timing tool.

What matters more than the first oversold print is how RSI behaves afterward — whether it begins to build momentum/higher lows that align with broader basing structure.

Bottom line: RSI can help frame the regime, but it doesn’t front-run the bottom by itself.

“Real bottoms are quiet” (and we’re not there)

Matt added a non-technical signal he watches every cycle:

  • Early declines = panic, nonstop discussion, everyone glued to charts

  • True bottoming = silence

    • Participation dries up

    • No one cares

    • “Bitcoin is dead” becomes background noise

    • Then… a tiny green candle feels euphoric because anything happening feels exciting

Their shared view: the market has seen capitulation — but it hasn’t seen indifference yet.

Cycle levels & confluence: where traders are looking if the bleed continues

Den highlighted two recurring “map references” traders keep on the radar:

  • Prior-cycle retracement behavior into a key band (she referenced a historical “FIB area” zone many traders watch)

  • A longer-term weekly MA ribbon (200/300) that has acted as support historically — which, on her charting, clusters around the high $40Ks to $50Ks area

Important framing from Den: this is not a prophecy. It’s a confluence map — the kind of zone that becomes relevant if the market continues to unwind.

Ethereum: “it doesn’t look good” — but it’s still a range story

ETH was the bleaker segment of the episode.

Den’s read:

  • ETH didn’t follow the same “clean cycle behavior” this time

  • It’s been moving more like a range asset

  • No significant new highs were made this cycle

  • Multiple significant supports were sliced immediately

The only constructive angle Den offered was conditional:

If ETH continues to behave like a range, traders may be able to treat it like one — but right now it’s battling lower timeframe resistance, and conviction is thin.

Matt’s broader point was also key: it’s hard to justify sustained alt exposure when ETH looks like this, because ETH tends to be a major pillar for broader alt strength.

The outlier: HYPE’s isolated strength (but don’t ignore the overhead)

Despite the risk-off tape, one chart kept showing up: HYPE.

Matt admitted it’s been “mystifying” — and flagged the question many traders have:

  • How much of this is real demand vs. structural support (e.g., buybacks/mechanics)?

  • Why is it holding up while so much else is bleeding?

Den’s technical stance was cautious but clear:

  • HYPE has shown impressive strength off the lows

  • But it’s now pressing into heavy resistance

  • She wouldn’t get excited without a convincing break and reclaim above the key overhead level

If it fails there, Den’s concern is that the move may end up looking like a deviation before continuation lower.

How to think about trades here: process over prediction

A few risk-management principles kept coming up throughout the episode:

  • Respect broken structure. When levels slice cleanly, you don’t treat rebounds like a fresh bull trend.

  • If you’re trading a bounce, trade it like a bounce. Smaller targets. Faster decision-making.

  • Time matters. Big regime changes rarely resolve in a week.

  • Let the market prove it. Reclaims, EMA flips, and sustained holds matter more than hope.

What to watch (and listen to) next

First, listen to the full Trading Spaces here:

Then, looking forward, both Matt and Den framed the near-term as: bounce potential, but fragile structure.

So key watch items are:

  • Does BTC stabilize and consolidate, or does it try (and fail) to reclaim lost levels quickly?

  • Does ETH regain any meaningful structure, or does it keep behaving like “dead money” in a broken range?

  • Can HYPE break and hold above resistance — or does it roll over and lose its isolated-strength status?

Stay close to @krakenfx, @ krakenpro, and @Dentoshi for the next session and clips from this one.

Trade with Dentoshi on Kraken Pro

The post appeared first on Kraken Blog.

인기 뉴스

How to Set Up and Use Trust Wallet for Binance Smart Chain
#Bitcoin#Bitcoins#Config+2 더 많은 태그

How to Set Up and Use Trust Wallet for Binance Smart Chain

Your Essential Guide To Binance Leveraged Tokens

Your Essential Guide To Binance Leveraged Tokens

How to Sell Your Bitcoin Into Cash on Binance (2021 Update)
#Subscriptions

How to Sell Your Bitcoin Into Cash on Binance (2021 Update)

What is Grid Trading? (A Crypto-Futures Guide)

What is Grid Trading? (A Crypto-Futures Guide)

Cryptohopper에서 무료로 거래를 시작하세요!

무료 사용 - 신용카드 필요 없음

시작하기
Cryptohopper appCryptohopper app

면책 조항: Cryptohopper는 규제 기관이 아닙니다. 암호화폐 봇 거래에는 상당한 위험이 수반되며 과거 실적이 미래 결과를 보장하지 않습니다. 제품 스크린샷에 표시된 수익은 설명용이며 과장된 것일 수 있습니다. 봇 거래는 충분한 지식이 있거나 자격을 갖춘 재무 고문의 조언을 구한 경우에만 참여하세요. Cryptohopper는 어떠한 경우에도 (a) 당사 소프트웨어와 관련된 거래로 인해, 그로 인해 또는 이와 관련하여 발생하는 손실 또는 손해의 전부 또는 일부 또는 (b) 직접, 간접, 특별, 결과적 또는 부수적 손해에 대해 개인 또는 단체에 대한 어떠한 책임도 지지 않습니다. Cryptohopper 소셜 트레이딩 플랫폼에서 제공되는 콘텐츠는 Cryptohopper 커뮤니티 회원이 생성한 것이며 Cryptohopper 또는 그것을 대신한 조언이나 추천으로 구성되지 않는다는 점에 유의하시기 바랍니다. 마켓플레이스에 표시된 수익은 향후 결과를 나타내지 않습니다. Cryptohopper의 서비스를 사용함으로써 귀하는 암호화폐 거래와 관련된 내재적 위험을 인정하고 수락하며 발생하는 모든 책임이나 손실로부터 Cryptohopper를 면책하는 데 동의합니다. 당사의 소프트웨어를 사용하거나 거래 활동에 참여하기 전에 당사의 서비스 약관 및 위험 공개 정책을 검토하고 이해하는 것이 필수적입니다. 특정 상황에 따른 맞춤형 조언은 법률 및 재무 전문가와 상담하시기 바랍니다.

©2017 - 2026 저작권: Cryptohopper™ - 판권 소유.